Home
Changing public policy and mining practices to ensure the health of individuals, communities and ecosystems

Donate Today

  • English
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Comments on the Proposed Tulsequah Chief Mine Project in Northwestern British Columbia, FEAI 36077

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

The extensive concerns and questions about the project indicate that it should be submitted to a mediator.

AttachmentSize
Comments on the Proposed Tulsequah Chief Mine203.89 KB
Tags:
  • British Columbia
  • Indigenous Rights
  • Redfern
  • share

Related Items

  • Attempt to Revive Proposed Prosperity Mine Must End Now
  • Barriere Lake First Nation Celebrates Mining Company's Retreat!
  • Ten Reasons Why Prosperity Mine Bid Will Fail
  • Tŝilhqot’in Determined to Fight “New” Prosperity Proposal
  • Tsilhqot’in Statement of Commitment to Protect the Land that Sustains Us and Our Future Generations
  • Taseko’s “New Prosperity” PR Misrepresents Panel Findings
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Publications
  • Video
    • Audio
  • Newsletters
  • Key Issues
    • Ensuring Corporate Accountability
    • Promoting Environmental Planning
    • Reforming Mining Laws and Policies
    • Protecting Water
  • Blog
  • Sign up for e-alerts

Get Involved

ACTION ALERT: Sherritt Must Be Accountable for All Human and Environmental Damage Caused by the Ambatovy Project
ACTION ALERT: Canada’s Environmental Assessment Law Is Under Attack
more

Stay in Touch

Sign up for e-alerts

Guided search

Click a term to initiate a search.

Categories

  • Company - Country - Issue (1075)

Content type

  • Article (506)
  • Get Involved (11)
  • News (590)
  • Publication (24)

Date authored

  • 2012 (53)
  • 2011 (118)
  • 2010 (91)
  • 2009 (89)
  • 2008 (19)
  • 2007 (82)
  • 2006 (144)
  • 2005 (186)
  • 2004 (59)
  • 2003 (88)
  • more...

Copyright MiningWatch Canada 2010

Twitter Facebook MySpace YouTube RSS

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Publications
  • Video
  • Newsletters
  • Key Issues
  • Blog
  • Sign up for e-alerts